[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2.....
From: |
Matt Kaufmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2..... |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:24:39 -0500 |
Hi --
Just a comment you and Camm can use or ignore as you choose....
We maintain ACL2 in a manner such that the workshop books are all expected to
certify. When I'm testing a local ACL2 build, I typically run the full
regression suite (including the workshop books) and I expect 100% to pass.
Perhaps the failure was just some weird Windows glitch, which would go away in
a re-run?
-- Matt
From: "Mike Thomas" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>, "Matt Kaufmann" <address@hidden>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:18:43 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
X-SpamAssassin-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0
X-UTCS-Spam-Status: No, hits=-304 required=180
Hi Camm.
| Greetings! I'm a bit confused here -- do we post that mingw passes
| the acl2 books certify test or not? We just are using 'make
| certify-books-fresh' for this purpose, i.e. no workshops. Please
| advise.
Call it a pass as it is workshop code and Matt seems not to be too worried
or, best of all, add a footnote if you can be bothered.
Cheers
Mike Thomas
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., (continued)
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Mike Thomas, 2004/06/08
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Mike Thomas, 2004/06/07
- Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Camm Maguire, 2004/06/08
- Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Matt Kaufmann, 2004/06/08
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Mike Thomas, 2004/06/08
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Mike Thomas, 2004/06/08
- Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Matt Kaufmann, 2004/06/08
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Mike Thomas, 2004/06/08
- Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Camm Maguire, 2004/06/12
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Mike Thomas, 2004/06/14
- Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2.....,
Matt Kaufmann <=
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Mike Thomas, 2004/06/14
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Mike Thomas, 2004/06/15
- Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Matt Kaufmann, 2004/06/15
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Mike Thomas, 2004/06/15
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Mike Thomas, 2004/06/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Camm Maguire, 2004/06/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Matt Kaufmann, 2004/06/28
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Mike Thomas, 2004/06/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Camm Maguire, 2004/06/12
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Mike Thomas, 2004/06/14