gcl-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2


From: Camm Maguire
Subject: Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2
Date: 17 Jun 2004 20:23:43 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

Greetings!

Mike, these compiler/binutils dependencies are most likely indicating
that we still have a problem in the linker, unless it is typical for
mingw/msys programs to behave this way.  At some point, we  need to
get a test case with the smallest .o file possible, and objdump -d
and objdump -x them.  Post 2.6.2 of course.

Yake care,

"Mike Thomas" <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi Vadim/Camm.
> 
> Some slightly better news on MinGW32 gcc 3.3.3/3.4.0; the MinGW32 "compiler"
> problems are at least partly alleviated by using binutils 2.14.90 rather
> than 2.15.90.
> 
> A few days ago I wrote in response to Vadim's test report:
> 
> | > I've reproduced that error with gcc 3.3.3 and binutils 2.15.90.
> 
> I did another test using binutils 2.14.90 instead of 2.15.90 with both gcc
> 3.3.3 and 3.4.0.
> 
> The gcc 3.3.3 Maxima "binary-gcl/specfn.o" problem goes away and with gcc
> 3.4.0 GCL now builds itself and Maxima - previously the GCL build failed.
> 
> The only fly in the ointment is that both these builds of Maxima now crash
> the very first regression test in "make check".
> 
> Having said that, at least now both of the problematic C compilers are
> producing identical results with GCL and Maxima which does simplify matters:
> 
> ===================================================================
> ....
> (C1)                            RUN_TESTSUITE()
> 
> Running tests in rtest1.mac:
> Unrecoverable error: Segmentation violation..
> 
> This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual
> way.
> Please contact the application's support team for more information.
> ===================================================================
> 
> In all these tests I used the recently released stable MinGW32 runtime 3.3.
> Separate tests with that new runtime and retaining binutils 2.15.90 failed
> to make any change for the better.
> 
> On that basis I am ruling out the new runtime as a contributor to those
> specific problems cured by the change in binutils version.
> 
> Best wishes for a pleasant weekend to everyone.
> 
> Mike Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]