[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes) |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 06:16:48 -0700 (MST) |
I agree 100% in the "cohesively" adjective, according to my latest
study and poll (among my co-workers, friends, etc.) the people doesn't
see GNU as an operating system, just as a bunch of tools, mainly: GCC,
and the GNU version of tar, awk, etc.
This is a side-effect of mislabeling the GNU system as "Linux".
They know about the GNU system, but they believe it isn't GNU,
so GNU must be something else.
I came to the conclusion that the only way to correct this is to
change the way people refer to the system, to convince people to say
"GNU/Linux".
And despite the predictions of many that this would be impossible,
it is gradually spreading. And people are starting to accept it.
- [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), (continued)
- [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Richard Stallman, 2000/11/19
- [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Hugo Gayosso, 2000/11/20
- [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Richard Stallman, 2000/11/22
- Re: [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Phillip Rulon, 2000/11/19
- Re: [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Hugo Gayosso, 2000/11/20
- Re: [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Phillip Rulon, 2000/11/21
- Re: [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes),
Richard Stallman <=
[gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Hugo Gayosso, 2000/11/14