[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes)
From: |
Hugo Gayosso |
Subject: |
[gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes) |
Date: |
20 Nov 2000 22:58:49 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> > The package maintainer is supposed to maintain them, but in many cases
> > they do it wrong.
>
> I think it is better to have webmasters doing webmaster things,
>
> The job of these pages is to describe the package. The package
> maintainer, who knows the package, can do this efficiently. The
> webmasters, to do this, would have to study each package. That would
> be very inefficient.
I agree, but what I meant is to work as the marketing (uugh!)
departments work, the webmasters take the information from the
maintainers and then create a web page following GNU guidelines. Or,
as I described in a previous email, for basic web pages all what is
needed from the maintainer is to create an XML file and a script will
do the work.
> Besides which, the webmasters have trouble handling the duties they
> already have. To transfer a large job from the maintainers to the
> webmasters would be rather unwise.
The idea of the XML and the script solves this problem.
> Therefore, my decision is that we will not change this.
"Is that your final answer?" :)
Greetings,
- --
Hugo Gayosso
GNU Volunteer Coordinator
http://www.gnu.org
http://hgayosso.linuxave.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6GfL5MNObVRBZveYRAjpbAJ4vMqEqUSVq6+R+gfyCHGogh6cT9QCfQECH
G+8t5JTP7mJP7pxH7MDscT4=
=Al6k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), (continued)
- [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Hugo Gayosso, 2000/11/17
- [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Richard Stallman, 2000/11/19
- [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Hugo Gayosso, 2000/11/20
- [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Richard Stallman, 2000/11/21
- [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Bradley M. Kuhn, 2000/11/21
- [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Hugo Gayosso, 2000/11/28
- [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Richard Stallman, 2000/11/19
- [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes),
Hugo Gayosso <=
- [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Richard Stallman, 2000/11/22
- Re: [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Phillip Rulon, 2000/11/19
- Re: [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Hugo Gayosso, 2000/11/20
- Re: [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Phillip Rulon, 2000/11/21
- Re: [gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Richard Stallman, 2000/11/22
[gfsd]Re: gas/binutils (a.k.a. we really suck sometimes), Hugo Gayosso, 2000/11/14