Re: [Gluster-devel] memory leaks

[Amar S. Tumballi]

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:52:35PM -0500, Brent A Nelson wrote:
> In my setup, it appears that the performance translators are all 
> well-behaved on the server-side, unlike the client-side.  Hopefully, this 
> will provide some useful clues...
> 
> Chaining all the performance translators off of my protocol/server volume, 
> all the translators seem to load on glusterfsd and they don't appear to be 
> causing any harm.  data-only transfers don't trigger a huge memory leak in 
> readahead, and metadata transfers appear to cause a memory leak in 
> glusterfsd only at the usual rate (it grows slowly whether or not I use 
> performance translators). io-thread does not cause glusterfsd to 
> die.
> 
> Do I chain the performance translators for the server the same way as for 
> the client? E.g.:
> 
> volume server
>   type protocol/server
>   subvolumes share0 share1 share2 share3 share4 share5 share6 share7 
> share8 share9 share10 share11 share12 share13 share14 share15
>   ...
> end-volume

you can't have more than one subvolumes in protocol/server xlator. The 
clustering 
ability is there only within cluster/{unify,stripe,afr} xlators.

> 
> volume statprefetch
>   type performance/stat-prefetch
>   option cache-seconds 2
>   subvolumes server
> end-volume
> 
> volume writebehind
>   type performance/write-behind
>   option aggregate-size 131072 # in bytes
>   subvolumes statprefetch
> end-volume
> 
> volume readahead
>   type performance/read-ahead
>   option page-size 65536 ### in bytes
>   option page-count 16 ### memory cache size is page-count x page-size per 
>   file#
>   subvolumes writebehind
> end-volume
> 
> volume iot
>   type performance/io-threads
>   option thread-count 8
>   subvolumes readahead
> end-volume
> 
no.. in server side, server should be the top most volume. and later, all other 
volumes should come. And about io-threads if you have used it in the client 
side, 
there is some work pending to make it run seemlessly (as few part of our code 
is 
not yet threadsafe). So, i advice you to run io-threads only on server.

> Thanks,
> 

I am working on read-ahead/memory leak issues now.. once found, will get back 
to you..

Amar 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>