[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash] gnash testing
From: |
Jens Petersen |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash] gnash testing |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Apr 2006 18:23:13 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060313) |
Rob Savoye wrote:
Jens Petersen wrote:
I didn't manage to get a backtrace with gdb, perhaps it is crashing
before there is a stack.
Are you running a debug build of Firefox, and then starting it with -g
".
No, I'm running /usr/bin/gnash. :)
With Gnash, you can also invoke the Flash movie and add
"?waitforgdb=yes", and the plugin will block in the very being of it's
initialization. Then you can attach GDB, and set breakpoints in that
instance.
Sorry, where does one add that?
On FC4, I've had problems with ATK, of all things. GTK+ has been a bit
of a moving target lately, so my gut feeling is this would be an issue
with one of the dependent libraries.
Ok - FC5 moved to gtk 2.8 with cairo too, so....
The polling loop continues after playing to handle events. This will
go away after the alpha release, cause I'm going to rewrite the event
handling to be more portable and handle conditions it was never designed
for.
Ok. :)
I haven't managed to get the plugin working properly in firefox.
Currently in FC4 it just seem to display the initial flash file
background, but then nothing happens. (In FC5 the plugin crashes
firefox as soon as it tries to render some flash.) I haven't tried i386.
Hum, on my i386 FC4 laptop, it works just fine.
Ok, I'll try again on i386.
I'm not a fan of using pkg-config, as it doesn't exist on any
non-GNU/Linux system, and many people don't even have this installed it
turns out. So at one point I rewrote the configure tests for Gnash to do
my own searching and not use pkg-config. So if you are having a
configure problem, I'd prefer to fix my test, and no[t] add a dependency
for pkg-config.
Ok, I quite like pkgconfig myself, but as long as configure works I'm
not too fussy. ;-) Let me get back to you on where the current
configure breaks for me.
I merged in a few of your spec file changes with the other patch I got
for the spec file. I'll check this after I do a little RPM building
testing.
Thanks,
Jens
[Gnash] Re: gnash testing, Jens Petersen, 2006/04/28