[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] ALL_MOVE considered superfluous
|
From: |
Gunnar Farneback |
|
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] ALL_MOVE considered superfluous |
|
Date: |
Mon, 07 Oct 2002 16:45:57 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (sparc-sun-solaris2.7) (with unibyte mode) |
Inge wrote:
> Is there really a reason for the ALL_MOVE move reason? This used to
> be called ATTACK_BOTH_MOVE, and was later renamed ALL_MOVE, taking the
> real move reasons as parameters. The idea was that it tells the move
> valuator that all of the move reasons apply to the move in question.
This is not a complete answer but to avoid confusion I want to point
out that there never has been an ATTACK_BOTH_MOVE. What we have had is
DEFEND_BOTH_MOVE, a converse to ATTACK_EITHER_MOVE.
/Gunnar