[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] ALL_MOVE considered superfluous
|
From: |
Gunnar Farneback |
|
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] ALL_MOVE considered superfluous |
|
Date: |
Sat, 12 Oct 2002 22:24:34 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (sparc-sun-solaris2.7) (with unibyte mode) |
Inge wrote:
> However. This is also the exact same thing that YOUR_ATARI_ATARI_MOVE
> is supposed to do. A YOUR_ATARI_ATARI_MOVE defends against a
> combination that captures one of several strings (two in the special
> case of DEFEND_BOTH). In the case of YOUR_ATARI_ATARI_MOVE, the
> choice between the strings is already done before registering the move
> reason in combination.c. Otherwise it is the same.
>
> So the thing that led me to start the discussion remains: that there
> is a redundant move reason.
Yes, they are overlapping but I think it's premature to remove
anything right now. Better to first get the valuation of combination
attacks and defend_both moves in a more solid shape.
/Gunnar