|
| From: | Inge Wallin |
| Subject: | Re: [gnugo-devel] ALL_MOVE considered superfluous |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:48:40 +0200 (MEST) |
> This is not a complete answer but to avoid confusion I want to point
> out that there never has been an ATTACK_BOTH_MOVE. What we have had is
> DEFEND_BOTH_MOVE, a converse to ATTACK_EITHER_MOVE.
Right! My wrong. But the question still remains.
-Inge
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |