Re: [gnugo-devel] games against 3.3.16

[Arend Bayer]

Hi,

> Here is little more additional information on the move 48 of the game. The 
> OWL analysis is good, telling O18 is the defense point. However, the tactical 
> reading gives N18 and seems to be overvalued.

Sorry, I maybe missing context: Which game is this?

>   N18: defense of worm M18
>   N18: -2.03 - suspected ineffective defense of worm M18
>   N18:   5.33 (followup) - threatens to capture L18
>   N18: 15.36 - change in territory
>   N18:   6.40 - total followup value, added 1.07 as territorial followup
>   N18: 3.20 - added due to followup (6.40) and reverse followup values (0.00)
>   N18: 0.63 - connects strings (connect value 6, shape factor 0.126)
>   N18:   35.00 - minimum accepted value
> Move generation values N18 to 35.00

This seems to be a bad "J" pattern, so not the tactical reading's fault.

Arend