gnugo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gnugo-devel] games against 3.3.16


From: SP LEE
Subject: Re: [gnugo-devel] games against 3.3.16
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:21:38 -0700


> 
> Hi,
> 
> > Here is little more additional information on the move 48 of the game. The 
> > OWL analysis is good, telling O18 is the defense point. However, the 
> > tactical reading gives N18 and seems to be overvalued.
> 
> Sorry, I maybe missing context: Which game is this?
> 
> >   N18: defense of worm M18
> >   N18: -2.03 - suspected ineffective defense of worm M18
> >   N18:   5.33 (followup) - threatens to capture L18
> >   N18: 15.36 - change in territory
> >   N18:   6.40 - total followup value, added 1.07 as territorial followup
> >   N18: 3.20 - added due to followup (6.40) and reverse followup values 
> > (0.00)
> >   N18: 0.63 - connects strings (connect value 6, shape factor 0.126)
> >   N18:   35.00 - minimum accepted value
> > Move generation values N18 to 35.00
> 
> This seems to be a bad "J" pattern, so not the tactical reading's fault.
> 
> Arend
> 
> 

OK, here is the game record again (current CVS white against 3.3.16)

(;GM[1]FF[4]RU[Japanese]SZ[19]HA[0]KM[5.5]RE[B+66.5]
PW[GNU Go 3.3.21 (random seed 1568450343)]PB[GNU Go 3.3.16 (random seed 
1568450343)]
;B[pd];W[dc];B[pp];W[dp];B[pj];W[nq];B[lq];W[qq];B[qp];W[pq]
;B[op];W[nr];B[mo];W[de];B[cg];W[nd];B[pf];W[pc];B[qc];W[oc]
;B[qb];W[jc];B[dn];W[fp];B[dj];W[iq];B[cp];W[cq];B[co];W[bq]
;B[nf];W[ce];B[ko];W[lf];B[lh];W[an];B[jg];W[hf];B[je];W[hh]
;B[me];W[gc];B[ld];W[mc];B[lc];W[lb];B[kb];W[mb];B[jb];W[ji]
;B[lj];W[ic];B[kc];W[jk];B[ga];W[ll];B[kk];W[eb];B[fh];W[rq]
;B[rp];W[kj];B[lk];W[sp];B[so];W[sq];B[rn];W[li];B[mi];W[ki]
;B[bf];W[mj];B[mk];W[mh];B[nj];W[jh];B[kg];W[be];B[ef];W[ig]
;B[kh];W[ib];B[ia];W[bm];B[if];W[hj];B[bk];W[cl];B[dl];W[fi]
;B[ei];W[ie];B[jf];W[jd];B[dk];W[nh];B[mg];W[gh];B[fk];W[fg]
;B[eh];W[fj];B[ff];W[gg];B[cm];W[eg];B[jm];W[df];B[ae];W[ad]
;B[af];W[bc];B[bn];W[ao];B[bl];W[am];B[bo];W[ap];B[fn];W[kr]
;B[lr];W[ks];B[ho];W[hp];B[go];W[gk];B[fl];W[bh];B[ch];W[hl]
;B[mr];W[ke];B[lg];W[ng];B[mf];W[kd];B[ns];W[or];B[eo];W[gp]
;B[dq];W[ep];B[bp];W[do];B[cn];W[aq];B[hm];W[jl];B[kl];W[os]
;B[ms];W[le];B[md];W[io];B[kq];W[jr];B[fb];W[fc];B[fo];W[gb]
;B[fa];W[ea];B[ha];W[in];B[im];W[hb];B[ja];W[gl];B[gm];W[il]
;B[jp];W[ip];B[al];W[dr];B[np];W[cf];B[bg];W[jn];B[kn];W[ej]
;B[mq];W[dg];B[dh];W[ek];B[el];W[oq];B[qr];W[rr];B[rs];W[pr]
;B[qs];W[sn];B[ro];W[ss];B[sr];W[oe];B[of];W[ss];B[gi];W[ps]
;B[gj];W[hi];B[hn];W[jq];B[jo];W[ls];B[kf];W[];B[])


SP Lee




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]