[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rms] Re: Is Java free software?
|
From: |
Matt Lee |
|
Subject: |
Re: [rms] Re: Is Java free software? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:30:47 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824) |
Richard Stallman wrote:
> I do not know current facts about Java status,
> but your reasoning and your general approach seem correct.
Current status of GPL Java from Sun is that *most* of it is there, but
right now you need to install non-free Java to compile it, and it still
has binary non-free plugs.
So, it's coming along, but is not there yet.
- Re: Is Java free software?, (continued)
- Re: Is Java free software?, MJ Ray, 2007/09/23
- Re: Is Java free software?, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/23
- Re: Is Java free software?, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/24
- Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions", GNU Herds work team, 2007/09/30
- Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions", MJ Ray, 2007/09/30
- Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions", Davi Leal, 2007/09/30
Re: Is Java free software?, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/23
- Re: [rms] Re: Is Java free software?,
Matt Lee <=
[gnu.org #343879] Re: [rms] Re: Is Java free software?, Justin Baugh via RT, 2007/09/25