[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the Free Software definition
From: |
Davi Leal |
Subject: |
Re: the Free Software definition |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:10:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
John Darrington wrote:
> "criteria" is plural, so this should read "Which criteria are applied".
Fixed.
> > For a program, follow the Free Software link to know the criterion.
>
> "criterion" however is singular, but there's more than one. So this
> should also read "criteria".
Fixed.
> Instead of saying "follow the Free Software link", why not paste
> the text into the answer?
It is very long. It is the Free Software definition
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
I have replaced
"follow the Free Software link"
with
"read the Free Software definition"
> Or, if the link is a reliable one, put a hyperlink in the answer.
Yes, the link is reliable. I have added the link.
Additionally I have added the Java and .NET cases, so as to readers can know
how such criteria work.
As usual I do not like my wording. Let me know about any mistake, improvement,
etc.
http://gnuherds.org/faq
- Is Java free software?, GNU Herds work team, 2007/09/22
- Re: Is Java free software?, MJ Ray, 2007/09/23
- Re: Is Java free software?, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/23
- Re: Is Java free software?, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/24
- Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions", GNU Herds work team, 2007/09/30
- Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions", MJ Ray, 2007/09/30
- Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions", Davi Leal, 2007/09/30
Re: Is Java free software?, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/23
[gnu.org #343879] Re: [rms] Re: Is Java free software?, Justin Baugh via RT, 2007/09/25