[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions"
From: |
GNU Herds work team |
Subject: |
Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions" |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:10:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
We have added the below criteria to be applied to "Software distributions",
which are, maybe, another special case, as previously were specifications,
protocols, etc.:
"For software distributions, they must not include any
Non-Free Software or work to provide easy access to
Non-Free Software, even if the default is all Free Software."
For example:
* Ubuntu is Non-Free because it contains Non-Free Software.
* Debian is Non-Free because it contains Non-Free Software BLOBs in
the Linux kernel, like Ubuntu, and work to provide easy access to
Non-Free Software.
* OpenBSD is Free because it does not ship anything that is Non-Free
Software.
Note: Not all Binary Large OBjects (BLOBs) are Non-Free Software, because of
BLOBs can be data (not compiled source code) licensed under a FS license.
Let us know any if it is wrong, etc.
Best regards,
The work team
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG/9iEX9bt9qIT3xkRAtHZAKCjRH34Bl5lg+qOTuswYtS5ip+9YQCgt7Up
7VsNW/xevNB/xxNx2cFmihs=
=J1/f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Is Java free software?, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/23
[gnu.org #343879] Re: [rms] Re: Is Java free software?, Justin Baugh via RT, 2007/09/25