|
From: | Jim Busser |
Subject: | Re: [Gnumed-devel] FAQ |
Date: | Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:35:56 -0800 |
On Mar 15, 2004, at 12:21 AM, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
well, we could say GnuMed is a HANDFUL... committed to EVENTUALLY provide ;-) ...but the issue may now adequately be covered by the FAQ 'When will GnuMed be ready" which I have with the other FAQs as one giant FAQ at gnumed.org - I await Tony to resolve a problem at gnumed.org to do with grouping and sorting before splitting them upWhat is GnuMed? GnuMed is a group of practising physicians, programmers and free software enthusiasts from around the world, committed to provide a superior, free software solution for community practice. Using tried-and-true technology, GnuMed software will start out having record-keeping, but will eventually cover all aspects of medical practice, and will interface well with 3rd-party software. Technicalspeaking, it tries to do things "cleanly", but takes a pragmatic ratherthan purist approach. Currently, data is accessed via business objectsimplemented in Python directly accessing the PostgreSQL RDBMS, but willaccess various types of data stores such as RDBMS' or LDAP.I am afraid thtat this wording implies we are a huge group developers.
I agree the screenshots make it look like it is at a much more developed stage than is the casehe was fooled into thinking that Gnumedwas more complete by screenshots and Knoppix-CDs. Guess that's my fault.
Do we have a site where we list features ? It's obviuosly not enough to tell- this is a good idea and can perhaps be incorporated into the roadmap on the wiki - when I get a chance I or someone can hyperlink the topics at the top of the roadmap to the detail text below - maybe we can then revise the topics into a table format with the table constructed to distinguish 0.1 from future functionspeople that Gnumed does not not do much yet. It's too fuzzy.We might need to establish a feature matrix and use green and red to indicatewhat is there and what is not.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |