[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Questions re database schema - normalization
|
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Questions re database schema - normalization |
|
Date: |
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:38:41 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
> > The question remains standing whether it makes sense to
> > provide a suburb field for those countries that use "suburb"
> > in it's meaning of "part of a locality".
> > IMO yes but it belongs into the street table, not the address
> > one as it is now.
> Yes, I think so too
OK, I put it there.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Questions re database schema - normalization,
Karsten Hilbert <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Questions re database schema - normalization, J Busser, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Questions re database schema - normalization, J Busser, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Questions re database schema - normalization, Horst Herb, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] the id_name debate, Richard Terry, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] the id_name debate, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] the id_name debate, Richard Terry, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] the id_name debate, Horst Herb, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Gui-Designers was the id_name debate, Richard Terry, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] simple vs. sophisticated, Sebastian Hilbert, 2004/09/03