Re: web frontend/patient singleton was: Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 (was Time for a major re-think in 2005)

[catmat]

Karsten Hilbert wrote:

> > either that , or rearrange the backend a bit so the singleton idea
> > isn't mandatory.
> >    
> Relaxing gmCurrentPatient to not be a Singleton does not make
> sense. After all that's why it's called as it is. However, if
> you forego the comfort gmCurrentPatient offers and start
> dealing directly with cPerson you are free to have as many of
> them around as your machine affords.
>  
what does gmCurrentPatient do that cPerson doesn't ?