gnumed-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] call for action


From: Richard Terry
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] call for action
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:07:05 +1000
User-agent: KMail/1.5.4

Sure, where do I get a tarball?. I;m using the same wxPython2.4 I've always 
used for the last couple of years to run this - same machine. I can run older 
version of gnumed (as I achrive the directory sometimes and redownload the 
whole thing. Something has changed recently. I tried running an old version 
at lunch time and it was ok.

I did try runnning it with the unicode line and no result.

Yes I can run individual files eg gmAbout, the gmMulticolumn sash thingy from 
carlos.

Anway, tel me how to use the tarball rather than the cvs and I'll try.

Regards

Richard

On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:46 am, you wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Could you please grab a tarball and put it in some other directory.
> Try the new shell script gm-0_1-from-cvs.sh.
> Do you have a unicode build or not. If not edit the script and enable
> --unicode-gettext=0
>
> Do other wx applications work ? Can you start files manually when
> appropriate. Try gmAbout.py.
>
> Thanks for your input
> Sebastian
>
> On Thursday 14 April 2005 03:40, Richard Terry wrote:
> > Mmm..... I can't even run the source at the moment because it segfaults,
> > leaves nothing in the log file even with debug!!!!
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:46 am, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 13 April 2005 21:00, Tim Churches wrote:
> > > > Ian Haywood wrote:
> > > > > I expect it to, without proprietary software:
> > > > >     - create, delete, edit demographics
> > > > >     - enter and view simple free text narratives
> > > > >     - create, edit, view a past history list
> > > > >     - upload and view documents
> > > > > Anything less, even as 0.1, will just get us laughed at.
> > > >
> > > > That is true.
> > > >
> > > > > My point is the way end-users will install gnumed will be very
> > > > > different (hopefully a lot simpler) than the current install, it's
> > > > > this, simpler, process that we want tested and debugged, learning
> > > > > how to install from source, for non-coders, is just a waste of
> > > > > their time.
> > > >
> > > > That is also true.
> > > >
> > > > Tim C
> > >
> > > What can I say. I trust your experience. You seem to perceive this as a
> > > bad idea so it must be. There is one catch. If indeed our documentation
> > > is flawed we will not know until version 0.1. But this seems to be what
> > > you guys want.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]