Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed billing 2011 - thread 2

[Jim Busser]

On 2011-05-19, at 10:03 AM, Jim Busser wrote:

> Suggest that the user's inbox includes a pseudo-record to indicate the 
> existence of not-yet-uploaded billings. I suppose that in the same way as 
> with unsigned labs, each affected patient would need to show in the inbox. 
> This may be acceptably non-excessive, because if the doctor is behind by more 
> than a dozen reports it could count as a reflection that they need to remedy 
> something about their workflow so as to get those reports completed AND get 
> the billing uploaded.

For first iteration, this could even just be a suitable query in the GNUmed 
"Reports" generator with any resulting patients (whose existing billed items 
which were not yet finalized) could be activated and the billed items finalized 
/ uploaded.