[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Data pack for ICD-9 :-)
From: |
Jim Busser |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Data pack for ICD-9 :-) |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:02:54 -0700 |
On 2011-09-26, at 1:39 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:18:12AM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:
>
>> However I do not think
>>
>> ref.icd9
>>
>> can have multiple values for the same code,
>
> It sure can.
Is it desirable -- or, more specifically, not a problem -- to have a variety of
patients (and even the same patient internally) coded multiple times with a
particular code, from a particular coding system, except that the same code
will exist in multiple languages and where in each case the codes themselves
(despite that they mean the same thing) will resolve to *different* primary
keys in (for example)
ref.icd9
clin.lnk_code2item_root
??
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Data pack for ICD-9 :-), Jim Busser, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Data pack for ICD-9 :-), Jim Busser, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Data pack for ICD-9 :-), Karsten Hilbert, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Data pack for ICD-9 :-),
Jim Busser <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Data pack for ICD-9 :-), Karsten Hilbert, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Data pack for ICD-9 :-), Jim Busser, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Data pack for ICD-9 :-), Karsten Hilbert, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Data pack for ICD-9 :-), Jim Busser, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Data pack for ICD-9 :-), Karsten Hilbert, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Data pack for ICD-9 :-), Karsten Hilbert, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Data pack for ICD-9 :-), Jim Busser, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Data pack for ICD-9 :-), Karsten Hilbert, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Data pack for ICD-9 :-), Jim Busser, 2011/09/28
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Data pack for ICD-9 :-), Karsten Hilbert, 2011/09/28