|
| From: | Adam Fedor |
| Subject: | Re: NSLog and fprintf in base |
| Date: | Sat, 13 Mar 2004 21:36:09 -0700 |
On Mar 12, 2004, at 2:58 AM, Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
But wouldn't it be nicer if we replace fprintf (stderr,...) with a custom log function that will also uses syslog? Also at the same time we could use the OutputDebugString methods on Windows as equivalent of the syslog on Unix. Any reasons, why this change would not be good?
Seems like a nice idea to make things more consistent. You're right though that fprintf is a failsafe method, so any replacement should work as robustly as fprintf does.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |