[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ObjectiveC accessors
From: |
Marcel Weiher |
Subject: |
Re: ObjectiveC accessors |
Date: |
Mon, 31 May 2004 14:48:01 +0100 |
On 31 May 2004, at 13:38, Helge Hess wrote:
I agree that this is not necessarily a good idea ;-), but notably
Boehm-GC can be used as a drop-in replacement for the malloc library
(without altering semantics!)
No. It definitely alters semantics, because programs with "hidden"
pointers will cease to function properly. These are legal C programs,
so by making them non-functional, you have altered semantics.
Cheers,
Marcel
--
Marcel Weiher Metaobject Software Technologies
address@hidden www.metaobject.com
Metaprogramming for the Graphic Arts. HOM, IDEAs, MetaAd etc.
1d480c25f397c4786386135f8e8938e4
- ObjectiveC accessors, Stefan Urbanek, 2004/05/30
- Re: ObjectiveC accessors, David Ayers, 2004/05/30
- Re: ObjectiveC accessors, Stefan Urbanek, 2004/05/30
- Re: ObjectiveC accessors, David Ayers, 2004/05/30
- GC ( Was: Re: ObjectiveC accessors), Stefan Urbanek, 2004/05/30
- Re: GC ( Was: Re: ObjectiveC accessors), David Ayers, 2004/05/30
- Re: GC ( Was: Re: ObjectiveC accessors), Helge Hess, 2004/05/30
- Re: GC ( Was: Re: ObjectiveC accessors), Public Look, 2004/05/30
- Re: ObjectiveC accessors, Marcel Weiher, 2004/05/31
- Re: ObjectiveC accessors, Helge Hess, 2004/05/31
- Re: ObjectiveC accessors,
Marcel Weiher <=
- Re: ObjectiveC accessors, Helge Hess, 2004/05/31
- Re: ObjectiveC accessors, Martin Kuball, 2004/05/31
Re: ObjectiveC accessors, Marcel Weiher, 2004/05/30