[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ObjectiveC accessors
From: |
Martin Kuball |
Subject: |
Re: ObjectiveC accessors |
Date: |
Mon, 31 May 2004 19:34:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.2 |
Am Monday 31 May 2004 16:33 schrieb Helge Hess:
> Incorrect. As mentioned it can be configured as a drop-in
> replacement which is 100% compatible to legal C programs. Hidden
> pointers will work with malloc_uncollectable (which will be used in
> replacement mode), but will properly expose the malloced sections
> for GC scanning on objects that use GC-malloc.
>
> So, just one of the misinformations floating around about Boehm-GC
> ;-) There are certainly issues with it, but actually it is pretty
> well thought out and provides a lot of options.
Is there something like a howto about using the BGC? Something like a
description of the steps you have to take to make it work. I guess
you first have to recompile the libs. But what about the
applications? Do you have to recompile them, too?
Martin
- Re: ObjectiveC accessors, (continued)
- Re: ObjectiveC accessors, Stefan Urbanek, 2004/05/30
- Re: ObjectiveC accessors, David Ayers, 2004/05/30
- GC ( Was: Re: ObjectiveC accessors), Stefan Urbanek, 2004/05/30
- Re: GC ( Was: Re: ObjectiveC accessors), David Ayers, 2004/05/30
- Re: GC ( Was: Re: ObjectiveC accessors), Helge Hess, 2004/05/30
- Re: GC ( Was: Re: ObjectiveC accessors), Public Look, 2004/05/30
- Re: ObjectiveC accessors, Marcel Weiher, 2004/05/31
- Re: ObjectiveC accessors, Helge Hess, 2004/05/31
- Re: ObjectiveC accessors, Marcel Weiher, 2004/05/31
- Re: ObjectiveC accessors, Helge Hess, 2004/05/31
- Re: ObjectiveC accessors,
Martin Kuball <=
Re: ObjectiveC accessors, Marcel Weiher, 2004/05/30