[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep improvements bounty
From: |
Riccardo |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep improvements bounty |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:21:39 +0200 |
Hello,
On Thursday, June 16, 2005, at 08:08 PM, Adrian Robert wrote:
I agree with Fabien's opinion (below). People are always interested to
work on new features -- it seems like the CoreData stuff for example is
already well on its way even though Tiger's just out -- but it's the
more thankless work like fixing bugs and filling in rarely-invoked
implementations that most needs to be compensated to occur at all.
I must agree with Adrian and Fabien. I discussed the matter on #irc too.
While I welcome the idea of attracting developers to complete and fix
gnustep, I think starting from CoreData is the wrong place.
Since we have limited resources, it would be better to complete -back
and -gui, to better portability and get some long-needed applications in
the Gnustep "system". Those things are needed anyway.
To rephrase a metaphor Jeff T. said: If you have limited money and two
flat tires in your car, your money may be not best spent buying new
alloy wheels!
cheers,
Riccardo
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, (continued)
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, David Ayers, 2005/06/16
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Fabien VALLON, 2005/06/16
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Adrian Robert, 2005/06/16
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Sheldon Gill, 2005/06/16
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Riccardo, 2005/06/17
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Stefan Urbanek, 2005/06/17
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2005/06/17
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/06/17
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty,
Riccardo <=
Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Quentin Mathé, 2005/06/16
Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Nicola Pero, 2005/06/17