Re: GNUstep improvements bounty

[Riccardo]

Hello,

On Friday, June 17, 2005, at 05:44 AM, Sheldon Gill wrote:

> Also, as the GNUstep funds and administration are very limited, I'd 
> suggest it best that bounty tasks be small, contained and very well 
> defined. They should be work on the -core libraries which provide 
> benefit to large numbers of users.

I agree on this point, but I would broaden the perspective: applications 
are important too. Thus a good and integrated HelpViewer  could be a 
nice thing. A good editor. A documentation browser. And many other tools 
and apps we discussed so often.

I stress my point that it is only for the time being that I would stress 
the importance of completing and stabilizing -core before adding more 
meat to the fire.
You port your mega-app to gnustep thanks to coredata and coreimage and 
then discover it is unreliable in operation because of some bug deep in 
-core ? wouldn't you be frustrated?

-R