[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPLv2 licensing issues
From: |
Yavor Doganov |
Subject: |
Re: GPLv2 licensing issues |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:39:51 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
В Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:08:52 +0000, Yavor Doganov написа:
>> I mentioned it on a previous e-mail, the issue needs to be escalated to
>> and clarified by the FSF.
>
> As Hubert explained, there is nothing to clarify.
Actually, this particular problem is one of the main reasons why the
relicensing of major libraries like GNU Libc and GnuTLS was put on hold
(for at least a year, AFAIK) -- to allow a longer period during which
people can upgrade smoothly to GPLv3 and LGPLv3.
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, (continued)
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Stefan Bidigaray, 2008/04/10
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Hubert Chathi, 2008/04/10
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Stefan Bidigaray, 2008/04/10
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Hubert Chathi, 2008/04/10
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Stefan Bidigaray, 2008/04/11
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Fred Kiefer, 2008/04/11
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Hubert Chathi, 2008/04/13
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Yavor Doganov, 2008/04/15
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Alexander Malmberg, 2008/04/12
Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Yavor Doganov, 2008/04/11
RE: GPLv2 licensing issues, Nicola Pero, 2008/04/10
Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Gregory John Casamento, 2008/04/11