[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang
From: |
Pete French |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:56:11 +0100 |
> From the mailing list when I asked this last, and from comparing the
> list of supported platforms for the two. Again, can you name one
> platform supported by ffcall and GNUstep, but not libffi? Does anyone
> want to jump in and say 'My platform doesn't support libffi! Please
> don't drop support!' or is this all hypothetical?
My platform (FreeBSD/amd64) supports ffcall but not libffi (or
this was the case last time I compiled GNUstep about a month ago)
so please don't drop support :-)
All the rest of the email, however, I agree with - the lack of
ObjC maintenance on GCC worries me greatly. I depend on this
stuff for my living, and for my business to make sales. Having
somewhere else to jump to would make me give a huge sigh of relief.
-pete.
- GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/30
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Ayers, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Ayers, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang,
Pete French <=
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Andrew Pinski, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Pete French, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Andrew Pinski, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Pete French, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Andrew Pinski, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Pete French, 2009/03/31