[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang
From: |
Pete French |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Apr 2009 01:53:23 +0100 |
> Would it be possible for you to check whether GNUstep works with
> libffi? On FreeBSD/i386, it defaults to using ffcall, but works
> better with libffi (i.e. doesn't randomly corrupt the stack when you
> pass NSInvocations between threads). You probably need to explicitly
> specify /usr/local/include and /usr/local/lib as ffi lib/include
> directories in configure.
Sure I can give that a try tomorrow. Last time I looked at it I
couldnt make it work with libffi, but things change.
-pete.
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, (continued)
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Ayers, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Pete French, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Andrew Pinski, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Pete French, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Andrew Pinski, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Pete French, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Andrew Pinski, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang,
Pete French <=