[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [flame] NEWS file is useless

From: David Chisnall
Subject: Re: [flame] NEWS file is useless
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:45:35 +0000

On 25 Nov 2009, at 22:39, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:

There are actually three levels of change information ...
NEWS  ... just the headlines
ReleaseNotes ... some more detail
ChangeLog ... everything

Maybe you are right and we shouldn't bother with NEWS? I'd be interested to know what others think.

I'd be in favour of ditching NEWS and ChangeLog.

ChangeLog has less information, in a less useful format, than the svn logs and is a hold-over from CVS not storing repository-wide change information sensibly. With svn log, you can get a log of change messages at any granularity that you like. If anyone actually cares about ChangeLog then they can do 'svn log > ChangeLog' on their local machine. Stuff in the svn log can be processed easily, and is easier for people to check than the ChangeLog, for example:

Release Notes should contain any major changes (new classes, new features, anything that breaks source or binary compatibility). This should ideally be updated as part of any major change.

NEWS is for... Actually, I've no idea what I'd expect to find in NEWS. Project news belongs on the web site, not in the svn repository (unless it's the /web branch of the repository...). The lack of news on the web site is one of my biggest problems with it; unless you check or, you'd think GNUstep was a dead project. Do we even have a sensible way of writing news for the GNUstep site? Currently I put GNUstep-related things on the √Čtoil√© blog[1], which is easy to write on (add Markdown file to repository, commit), but that's far from ideal.


[1] For example,

-- Send from my Jacquard Loom

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]