[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken)
From: |
Eric Wasylishen |
Subject: |
Re: Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken) |
Date: |
Mon, 9 May 2011 14:01:27 -0600 |
On 2011-05-08, at 12:47 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>> Datum: Sun, 08 May 2011 01:32:58 +0200
>> Von: Riccardo Mottola <address@hidden>
>> An: Eric Wasylishen <address@hidden>
>> CC: Developer GNUstep <address@hidden>
>> Betreff: Re: Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken)
>
>> Hi,
>>> On a related note, I think the Cairo backend also rounds the coordinates
>> of path points - shouldn't we get rid of that as well?
>>>
>> I think that perhaps we should. But it is a delicate issue. Try
>> Graphos:play with it drawing boxes and lines especially, check our
>> various backends and check cocoa. Try different line widths. My
>> impression is that on cairo everything is always blurred :) Xlib of
>> course never since it has no anti-aliasing. But Cocoa isn't as "bad" as
>> cairo, it usually looks fine for integer line widths.
>
> If I remember correctly the code here tries to avoid bluring for lines that
> the programmer would expect to be exactly horizontal or vertical oriented.
> This is the standard approach used by all cairo applications I know of. We
> should add a lot of tests before we change this.
Ok. I agreed it should be well tested if changed. Based on a quick check,
however, cairo's and Cocoa's default behaviour are exactly the same , i.e. the
examples here: http://www.cairographics.org/FAQ/#sharp_lines produce the same
results on Cocoa, so it doesn't appear that cocoa does any rounding below the
level of NSView implementations.
- Re: Gorm is broken, (continued)
- Re: Gorm is broken, David Chisnall, 2011/05/04
- Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken), Eric Wasylishen, 2011/05/03
- Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken), Eric Wasylishen, 2011/05/03
- Re: Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken), Riccardo Mottola, 2011/05/03
- Re: Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken), Eric Wasylishen, 2011/05/03
- Re: Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken), Fred Kiefer, 2011/05/04
- Re: Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken), Riccardo Mottola, 2011/05/07
- Re: Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken), Eric Wasylishen, 2011/05/07
- Re: Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken), Riccardo Mottola, 2011/05/07
- Re: Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken), Fred Kiefer, 2011/05/08
- Re: Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken),
Eric Wasylishen <=
- Re: Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken), Fred Kiefer, 2011/05/09
- Re: Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken), Eric Wasylishen, 2011/05/10
- Re: Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken), Quentin Mathé, 2011/05/09
- Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken), Eric Wasylishen, 2011/05/03