[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment
From: |
Biagio Lucini |
Subject: |
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:47:32 +0000 (GMT) |
On 11 Feb 2003, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> In fact, I think the more we try to get them to feel they're involved,
> which they obviously are, the easier it is to get our work accepted in
> the end. After all, it was us who had to discuss everything in a
> separate list and just dump an intimidating plan in the gcc list.
> Maybe that wasn't so smart, in retrospect...
>
Probably it wasn't, but by judging from the two main reactions to your
e-mail about pragma handling ( not caring at all or hypercritical) I think
to avoid to be kept in useless and time consuming petty querelles like the
last one probably we should keep going this way for a while, until we will
be able to show that we can produce something useful for the community at
large (I thought that was what FS was meant to be, but probably I was
wrong..)
Biagio
- [Gomp-discuss] Starting libgomp, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/02/11
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Starting libgomp, Diego Novillo, 2003/02/11
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Starting libgomp, Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/11
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment, Biagio Lucini, 2003/02/11
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment, Diego Novillo, 2003/02/11
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/02/11
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment, Biagio Lucini, 2003/02/11
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/02/11
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment, Diego Novillo, 2003/02/11
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/02/11