[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment
From: |
Scott Robert Ladd |
Subject: |
RE: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:17:00 -0500 |
> Nah, that's just Per "Bad Motivator" Bothner. I think the rest of the
> GCC people were not so negative. Just worried about the design, maybe.
> In fact, I think the more we try to get them to feel they're involved,
> which they obviously are, the easier it is to get our work accepted in
> the end. After all, it was us who had to discuss everything in a
> separate list and just dump an intimidating plan in the gcc list. Maybe
> that wasn't so smart, in retrospect...
Given my choice, I would have avoided discussing anything with the gcc group
until we had a bit more organization and definition for our task. In the
business world, I rarely broach proposals until I'm sure all my ducks are
quacking in line. This is especially true when dealing with a group like
GNU.
..Scott
- [Gomp-discuss] Starting libgomp, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/02/11
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Starting libgomp, Diego Novillo, 2003/02/11
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Starting libgomp, Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/11
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment, Biagio Lucini, 2003/02/11
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment, Diego Novillo, 2003/02/11
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/02/11
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment, Biagio Lucini, 2003/02/11
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/02/11
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment, Diego Novillo, 2003/02/11
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/02/11
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment, Diego Novillo, 2003/02/11
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment, Lars Segerlund, 2003/02/12