Re: [Gomp-discuss] WOMPAT 2003

[Biagio Lucini]

Right, let's give a fresh look at the todo list. We need:
a) a set of working libs
b) hooks (sorry if the term is not appropriate) in the compiler

In principle, I have no problem with my present knowledge in tackling A,
but B would be another thing... I could do something there as well, but I
need to be guided as a baby who hasn't learnt how to walk :-) I see many
of the potential contributors there to be up to something else (mainly,
tree-ssa), so probably noone will put big commitment on this stage before
that project has reached production-stage.

Will it be sensible to do some counting? Who is still there and still
wants to give a hand, even if not in a near future?

Biagio

On Thu, 15 May 2003, Lars Segerlund wrote:

>
>   As far as I am concerned, there is tons of stuff to do, and nobody is
> doing zit !
>
>   If you make a sugestion of a way to progress, it's all well do that
> later and so on.
>
>   We have everything to start off with the libs, ( if anybody have
> looked at makeing a build from the stubs I submitted ).
>
>   In the style of exa ( an example language for gcc & friens ), we could
> emit code for some 'static' cases ( namely the example from the spec )
> and verify correct behaviour in the backend.
>
>   This has NO parsing, NO fiddling with trees or anything such but would
> enable us to do work on a set of working libs.
>
>   I really got ticked of when nobody was looking at the cvs or the code
> in it :-( .... but if there is interest I am all ready for some coding :-) .
>