Re: [Gomp-discuss] corrections to gompspecs.tex

[Lars Segerlund]

 Not entirely true, libgomp is only the omp lib as specified by the standard, 
it's rather straightforward, and it has a simple abstraction which not much can 
be done about ( or has to be done about ).

 I posted a stub libgomp in the hope that we could 'hand parallelize' some of 
the examples from the openMP spec, thus we would have a lib running when we 
started with the compiler.

 I have started to look at the old code again now, and will put some effort 
into it.

 All this also fits with my resent effoer to really get to grips with gcc.. ( 
GENERIC & Gimple ).

 / Lars Segerlund.


On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:07:03 +0100 (CET)
Biagio Lucini <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Melvin Hadasht wrote:
> 
> > I am not a technical guy, but my plan is the following:
> >
> > 1. make libgfortran thread safe (I am starting with the IO part), 2.
> > help with libgomp, once the internals of gcc adapted to concurrent code
> > and in the meanwhile learn about gcc internals. I'll see then if can be
> > of a more help.
> 
> Making libgfortran tread-safe it is a good idea on its own anyway. As far
> as libgomp is concerned, I think when we stopped discussing the focus was
> on how we implement parallelism at that level.
> 
> Cheers
> Biagio
> 
> 
> =========================================================
> 
> Biagio Lucini
> Institut Fuer Theoretische Physik
> ETH Hoenggerberg
> CH-8093 Zuerich - Switzerland
> Tel. +41 (0)1 6332562
> 
> =========================================================
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gomp-discuss mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomp-discuss