[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [e9e92ee00811f7d0fcbde415346f7f4f7be14528] missed one
From: |
Steffen Nurpmeso |
Subject: |
Re: [e9e92ee00811f7d0fcbde415346f7f4f7be14528] missed one |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Sep 2022 15:30:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
s-nail v14.9.24-295-g629abc8b54 |
Hello Branden,
..again, and sorry, for the noise..
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20220907210913.drF4V%steffen@sdaoden.eu>:
|P.S.:
...
|||(Actually my less(1) pull request will not find the IDs my mdocmx
...
|I updated the pull request with an additional fix commit that
...
|I would still hope for a possibility to create anchor-only OSC 8.
Actually i will update it again with
osc8_inspect(): ignore "#[no ID]" local anchor URIs..
Like in HTML #ID are in-document local anchor references.
An URI # without ID does not lead anywhere usually.
Ignore them in the sole case that there also was an id= parameter,
meaning this OSC 8 construct is meant to *create* a local anchor.
Like this less(1) will be capable to deal with local anchors
generated by grotty(1)'s 1.23[.0] \X'tty: link' command.
(Which, perspectively, will be used for interactive Unix manual
pages.)
Whether it will make it i cannot tell. But i can tell you
i _love_ to use the interactive manual pages since 2014.
Of course, only for the programs i created myself, but that is
a pity!
Ciao.
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)