[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] biosdisk / open_device() messing up offsets
From: |
Pavel Roskin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] biosdisk / open_device() messing up offsets |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:47:17 -0400 |
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 01:35 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> It seems that open_device() in biosdisk is messing up offsets when
> accessing partitions. For example if you try:
>
> grub> hexdump (hd0,1)
>
> in grub-emu, you'll get a message saying lseek failed. The problem is that
> it substracts to the sector offset, so all accesses get to wrong data and
> accessing sector 0 results in underflow.
>
> I would think those lines (see patch) are plainly wrong, but they appear to
> be very old, and it is strange that this wasn't noticed earlier. Maybe we
> have changed behaviour around partition/disk offsets, causing this breakage
> without noticing?
The question whether sector is relative to the partition or to the whole
disk. From what I see in disk/memdisk.c or it disk/i386/pc/biosdisk.c,
the sector is relative to the whole disk. There is no compensation for
partition offsets. That's low-level code that doesn't know about
partitions, and util/biosdisk.c correctly tries to emulate that.
I guess grub-emu gets it wrong somewhere.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
- [PATCH] biosdisk / open_device() messing up offsets, Robert Millan, 2008/06/04
- Re: [PATCH] biosdisk / open_device() messing up offsets,
Pavel Roskin <=
- Re: [PATCH] biosdisk / open_device() messing up offsets, Robert Millan, 2008/06/06
- Re: [PATCH] biosdisk / open_device() messing up offsets, Pavel Roskin, 2008/06/06
- Re: [PATCH] biosdisk / open_device() messing up offsets, Pavel Roskin, 2008/06/07
- Re: [PATCH] biosdisk / open_device() messing up offsets, Bean, 2008/06/07
- Re: [PATCH] biosdisk / open_device() messing up offsets, Pavel Roskin, 2008/06/08
- Re: [PATCH] biosdisk / open_device() messing up offsets, Bean, 2008/06/08