[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building a software toolchain that works
From: |
Yasuaki Kudo |
Subject: |
Re: Building a software toolchain that works |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Mar 2022 05:13:44 +0900 |
I am very interested in this topic, too!
At work, I have been forced to use the NPM package manager and since the first
day I have been unable to understand this enigma - how on earth do people work
with this fuzzy system almost designed to be unaccountable?? Can Guix replace
NPM?
I think we are really onto something - my hunch is that technicalities are only
half of the issue and the other is the community building for democratic and
accountable software(for which, concepts like Free Software will fit naturally)
-Yasu
> On Mar 17, 2022, at 00:29, Ryan Prior <rprior@protonmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, March 16th, 2022 at 2:02 PM, Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz>
> wrote:
>
>> Let me chime in on a specific point.
>> [...]
>> I don't think I would've written these patches without Guix's help.
>
> This is CRUCIAL to Guix's value proposition: by abstracting away so much of
> the incidental complexity of software, Guix enables a nimble, carefree mode
> of hacking where you'll create and improve software that would never have
> been worth the trouble otherwise.
>
> Proposals like David's `guix contribute` play on the strength of Guix as an
> enabling technology. That's exactly the kind of thing I meant when I wrote
> "double down." How can I encourage the improvement & implementation of such
> proposals? A few notions:
>
> a. My Guile isn't strong enough to put together a proof-of-concept in Guix as
> a solo effort. I might be able to write a PoC in concert with a more
> experienced Guiler. We could schedule some strategy & pair programming
> sessions to get something on track.
>
> b. I could work on a PoC using a language I'm better trained with (elisp,
> Ruby and JavaScript are my three strongest languages probably.) I don't know
> how that would be received by the Guix commons, I've felt discouraged in the
> past to extend Guix unless it's in Guile but perhaps that's a false anxiety.
>
> c. I could also provide some funding if somebody has time & skills to create
> a PoC and just needs the financial incentive. If this is you, reach out.
>
>
> I've been pleased to see ideas resonate in this thread. It makes me believe
> many of us have some form of this thought in our heads and that by
> socializing we can bring something fresh to the free software world. What are
> the next steps?
>
Re: Building a software toolchain that works, Olivier Dion, 2022/03/14
Re: Building a software toolchain that works, zimoun, 2022/03/17
Re: Building a software toolchain that works, david larsson, 2022/03/18
Re: Building a software toolchain that works, Yasuaki Kudo, 2022/03/18
Windows Subsystem for Linux, zimoun, 2022/03/19