Re: rust-build-system from antioxidant

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Hi Nicolas,

Nicolas Graves <ngraves@ngraves.fr> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for this discussion that I didn't expected to happen ;)
>
> I'll try and finish a version of the rust-build-system but I'd like to
> know if there are reasons to not want a direct and complete rewrite of
> all Rust packages before putting more time into this. My rationale is
> that since we have channels, users won't really be affected in any
> meaningful way because adding a "snapshot of cargo packages" in a
> channel and then adding the channel is straightforward.

Thank you!

My impression is that the Rust packaging in Guix is so problematic that
if a way would mean less work for you and motivate you to push this work
to the finish line it, that may well be the better way :-).

> I've merged the rust-build-system and rust-workspace-build-system into a
> single one, and made some UX improvements (a dozen patches on top of
> Maxime's work).
>
> If atomicity / readability of changes is the issue, I can try to cut the
> packages rewrites into patches (although that would make more than 1k
> patches total I think).

That would match our convention better, if it's not too difficult to
accomplish (is this going to be automated?  I've written some imperfect
but useful automatic rewriting tool in the past to remove the Python 2
packages [0].  Perhaps it could provide some ideas)

[0]  
https://notabug.org/apteryx/guix-api-examples/src/master/purge-python2-packages.scm

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim