Re: [Gzz] Asko 2003-02-03

[Tuomas Lukka]

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:36:23AM +0200, Asko Soukka wrote:
> Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> > > >    coloring broken links red would be a nice feature, but it's
> > >
> > > (i need to study what links can be broken there and how)
> >
> > For example, the diagram says "jlink" (i.e. make a link to javadoc here)
> > but the class doesn't exist.
> 
> Is "j" in jlink for "java"?
> 
> When matching focusing Gzz_Frontend_View.rst is currently mixed with
> class gzz.view.View. Sometime, there was also discussion about "a plugin
> interface" for different documentation types for umllinktool.
> 
> Could a good place for this be creating distinct link commands
> for different documentation. E.g.:
> 
>   jlink for javadoclink
>   rlink for reSTlink
>   clink for doc++link

Great idea! Except I think I'd prefer alink for arch.doc links; 
relating to the use, not the tool.

        Tuomas