Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again

[Matti Katila]

On Mon, 12 May 2003, Tuomas Lukka wrote:

> Overall changes 
> ---------------
> 
> Create new package, ``org.fenfire.vocab.lava``.
> 
> Move most of the vocabulary entries into lava.
> 
> Freeze ``org.fenfire.vocab``. Changes only through PEG process.
> 
> Change the prefix ``http://fenfire.org/vocabulary/``
> to ``http://fenfire.org/rdf-v/``.
> After the prefix, each namespace shall contain the year and month it was 
> originally
> defined in, in the form
> ``2003/05/``. After that, the name of the namespace, lowercase, with .html 
> -suffix.
> So, for instance, FF.content would be
> ``http://fenfire.org/rdf-v/2003/05/fenfire.html#content``.

And then we need a script which takes care to link every vocabulary
to http://fenfire.org/rdf-v/?


> ALPH
> """"
> 
> Remove ``content``, is in FF.
> 
> Remove ``clone`` and ``cloneType`` and ``dataType``, 
> not current/relevant.
> 
> Remove ``xuType``, should be ``xuLinkType``.
> 
> Then, we have left ``xuLinkFrom``, ``xuLinkTo``, ``xuLinkType``.
> We should probably avoid 'xu' in the permanent names,
> just in case. These should be moved to CLINK.CLink, CLINK.cLinkFrom,
> CLINK.cLinkTo for clink, "content link", a term Ted at some point used.

I think you got lost with your definitions :)

CLINK.to and CLINK.from 
  or 
CLINK.left and CLINK.rigth


And what we want to say with 

 /**                                    ,--ALPH:xuLinkFrom -> enfilade 
  *    ALPH.xuType <--RDF:type --- id--<
  *                                     '--ALPH:xuLinkTo-> enfilade
  */

It's like CLINK.Pair or CLINK.Nut (or something related to fen .)
or CLINK.container.

But it's not CLINK.CLink - this is not a programming language.
 
> FF
> ""
> 
> Retain. Javadocs::
>       static public Object content;

Should be final?


> Combine to one class, CANVAS2D.
> Rename ``Canvas`` to ``Canvas2D``.

Again, 'CANVAS2D.Canvas2D' ugh..
CANVAS2D.Canvas tells a lot more than CANVAS2D.Canvas2D.

At least to me the latter one leaves a question: "And that means?"

> PP
> ""
> 
> Remove everything except association. Move association to DLINK.

What? Content link and dynamic link? Hmm, yes, because clink can also mean 
constant link ;)

> Name comes from "Directed LINK".

Ou.. that was not the first thing in mind.

> Javadoc::
>     /** RDF vocabulary for directed (so far typeless)
>      * one-to-one links.
>      */
>     public class DLINK {
>       /** The directed link association.
>        * A and B are linked by the tuple (A, DLINK.dLink, B)
>        */
>       static public Object dLink;
>     }

Hmm, 'DLINK.dlink'  - Are you sure?-)  

Don't take this personally but it's little funny :)


> RDF
> """
> 
> Leave as is, javadoc properly. Javadoc::

But it has only a 'type'. Do we want to say in public that we need only 
type of the RDF related vocabs?-) 


   -Matti