[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated fo
From: |
Luis Falcon |
Subject: |
Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health? |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Sep 2014 16:27:14 +0100 |
Hi Axel !
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 13:18:18 +0200
Axel Braun <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> Am Montag, 8. September 2014, 11:56:39 schrieben Sie:
>
> > > > I think that is a good idea to add tryton_purchase to
> > > > gnuhealth. It covers 99% of our needs.
> > >
> > > A good point. An even better, if your below example is persistent
> > > in the demo database. (Can we use it with real supplier and
> > > product names?)
> >
> > Axel, I have included Carl's data related to the meds supplier in
> > the health26 database. It is now persistent. This dump will be
> > different than the "standard" dump for the 2.6 series, since the
> > latter does not include these modules. We will make them default in
> > the upcoming GNU Health 2.8 .So, the community server demo DB will
> > differ slightly from the standard backup.
>
> No problem, I would appreciate if we can publish it on the Live-CD.
> Can you provide me a download link for the DB?
>
Sure. Then what I will do is to publish this pg_dump with the name of
health26_community_server.sql.gz , so you know is the one that contains
the purchase, account_invoice_stock and stock_supply modules and data.
I should publish it later today or tomorrow, along the 2.6.3 patchset.
Best,
> Cheers/Axel
>
>
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, (continued)
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Axel Braun, 2014/09/04
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, address@hidden, 2014/09/04
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Carl-Johan Francke, 2014/09/05
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, address@hidden, 2014/09/06
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Emilien Klein, 2014/09/06
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Luis Falcon, 2014/09/07
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Carl-Johan Francke, 2014/09/07
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Axel Braun, 2014/09/08
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Luis Falcon, 2014/09/08
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Axel Braun, 2014/09/08
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?,
Luis Falcon <=
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Carl-Johan Francke, 2014/09/08
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Luis Falcon, 2014/09/08
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, address@hidden, 2014/09/09
- [Health-dev] Ideas for an easy to use and more integrated version of Tryton, address@hidden, 2014/09/12