[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated fo
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health? |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:07:25 +0100 (BST) |
Hi Luis
When setting up a new "Party" = supplier (pharmaceutical wholesaler)
in GNU Health I am presented with tick boxes - Person, Institution, Insurance
Company, Pharmacy.
Should GNU Health have 2 new tick box options to facilitate
the ordering and issuing of medicament and medical supplies - "Supplier" and
"Customer" (which may be a customer or a patient or a ward or a clinic)?
Regards
Andrew
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, (continued)
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Luis Falcon, 2014/09/07
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Carl-Johan Francke, 2014/09/07
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Axel Braun, 2014/09/08
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Luis Falcon, 2014/09/08
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Axel Braun, 2014/09/08
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Luis Falcon, 2014/09/08
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Carl-Johan Francke, 2014/09/08
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?, Luis Falcon, 2014/09/08
- Re: [Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?,
address@hidden <=
- [Health-dev] Ideas for an easy to use and more integrated version of Tryton, address@hidden, 2014/09/12