Re: Syslog facility (Side Note)

[Mark Burgess]

On 29 Sep, Chip Seraphine wrote:
> 
> I'm a bit confused by this.  What "support"?  It's a syslogd 
> replacement-- using it is no different than using any other syslog 
> daemon implementation.  The difference is in what it does after it 
> receives information via syslog(3).  Using syslogd or msyslogd or 
> mod-syslogd or syslog-ng should have no bearing whatsoever on the 
> application generating the messages (cfengine).
> 
> Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no wrote:
>> Is this a commercial product? That would make it rather
>> inapplicable. But if it were easy to support as an alternative, I'd
>> be willing.
>> 
>> M
>> 

This all seems to have been a red herring. If it is a drop-in
replacement then there is no issue.

M

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Work: +47 22453272            Email:  Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no
Fax : +47 22453205            WWW  :  http://www.iu.hio.no/~mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~