[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?
From: |
Pascal Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming? |
Date: |
01 Jun 2003 08:12:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Jimmerr <jimkkREMOVEME@umich.edu> writes:
> If I use a different editor from emacs, what features will I be losing
> in terms of programming with gcc?
I don't know how you do it, but personnaly, I don't program with gcc.
I compile my programs with gcc or with other compilers, and that's
about all I ask them to do.
My programing is done with my brains, my hands, a keyboard and a good
editor. emacs is a good editor to edit programs, because it allows me
to meta-program: to write lisp programs to generate parts of my
programs automatically. If I used an other editor, I would have to
use a separate lisp environment to generate my programs, and I would
not have all those nice editing functions already built in emacs to
modify/generate my programs.
--
__Pascal_Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do not adjust your mind, there is a fault in reality.
- Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?,
Pascal Bourguignon <=
- Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?, Jason Rumney, 2003/06/01
- Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?, Ole Laursen, 2003/06/01
- Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?, Dave Steffen, 2003/06/02
- Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?, Mark Mynsted, 2003/06/02
- Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?, Arnold, 2003/06/05
- Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2003/06/05
- Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?, Elf M . Sternberg, 2003/06/09