[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?
From: |
Pascal Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming? |
Date: |
05 Jun 2003 19:32:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) 21.3.50.pjb1.1 |
Jimmerr <jimkkREMOVEME@umich.edu> writes:
> If I use a different editor from emacs, what features will I be losing
> in terms of programming with gcc?
>
> Thanks
> Jim
As I've already written, you don't program with gcc, you program with
your brains, your little fingers and an editor.
So if the question is what features you would lose in terms of
compiling with gcc your C programs, I'd say none at all, go ahead,
enter your C programs with a switch panel in binary!
Otherwise you must compare the features of emacs with those of another
editor and see which one gives more for your bucks, that is, for the
work of your fingers and of your brains.
--
__Pascal_Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do not adjust your mind, there is a fault in reality.
- Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2003/06/01
- Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?, Jason Rumney, 2003/06/01
- Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?, Ole Laursen, 2003/06/01
- Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?, Dave Steffen, 2003/06/02
- Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?, Mark Mynsted, 2003/06/02
- Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?, Arnold, 2003/06/05
- Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?,
Pascal Bourguignon <=
- Re: Is emacs helpful or necessary to gcc programming?, Elf M . Sternberg, 2003/06/09