[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs from CVS question
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs from CVS question |
Date: |
30 Nov 2003 08:20:32 +0200 |
> Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help
> From: Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net>
> Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 09:56:58 -0600
>
> 1. The Emacs splash screen seems to be missing (I have a different
> build obtained through the Fink Project which does present the
> splash screen, v. 21.2.something)
If you invoke Emacs with no arguments, you will see it. If it still
doesn't appear, try "emacs -q".
> 3. CVS provides Gnus 5.9 rather than 5.10.
The Emacs CVS has the version of Gnus that the Gnus maintainers commit
to the Emacs CVS. If you think it's time for a newer Gnus to become
part of the Emacs CVS, please talk to the Gnus maintainers and ask
them to do that.
> 7. In /usr/local/bin both emacs and emacs-21.3.50 were installed and
> appear to be identical- same size, date and when launched both
> provided teh same version information. Why was this- something I
> did with the installation?
These file `emacs' should be actually a hard link to the file
`emacs-21.3.50' (assuming OS X supports them--I have no idea if it
does), so that you are looking at 2 different names for the same file.
This is how Emacs is built on every other platform. The intent is
that when you install a newer version, `emacs' gets linked to it,
while the older version is left behind, in case you want to downgrade
to it later. In other words, it's a feature.
- Emacs from CVS question, Tim McNamara, 2003/11/29
- Re: Emacs from CVS question,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs from CVS question, Glenn Morris, 2003/11/30
- Re: Emacs from CVS question, Piet van Oostrum, 2003/11/30
- Re: Emacs from CVS question, Martin Stemplinger, 2003/11/30
- Re: Emacs from CVS question, Hugh Wolf, 2003/11/30