[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?! |
Date: |
27 Feb 2004 17:58:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> > I have it turned off. I use Emacs mostly for TeX programming, and
> > there its competence in analysing complex TeX documents is not
> > convincing (complex TeX documents can hardly be tackled by
> > anything but TeX, since syntax categories in this macro language
> > change on the fly).
>
> > I am exposed to large amounts of text all the time. The contrast
> > on screen is already much lower than on paper, I need not lower it
> > more artificially.
>
> I have changed most of my font-lock faces to be black-on-white (my
> default scheme) and I use bold & italics to distinguish things.
If one happens to have sane bold and italic fonts, probably not the
worst idea.
An emacs -mc option (monochrome) as mentioned here could do this as
well instead of switching font locking off altogether. I think that
such a setting could get me to live with font lock.
> > In a typical TeX macro document, more than half of the important
> > text consists of comments.
>
> Have you tried my new doctex-mode ? It's not using AUCTeX so it's
> probably no good for you, but you might like the idea.
The thing in CVS? That merely fiddles with fontlock, right?
> I don't hack on such docs enough to have a good feel for what would
> be really useful, tho. The idea is just to try and turn those "code
> in comment" back into non-comments.
We (actually, mostly Ralf Angeli) currently are working on filling and
insertion and other stuff in AUCTeX that will accept comments as a
separate syntax domain with regard to LaTeX command insertion and
indentation. Separate branch named new-fill, currently. Very
impressive.
We have not yet taken a look at the related font lock issue, however.
> Hmm... I do have comments in a greyish color to make them less
> visible, but then I try to avoid having important stuff in comments.
Well, _if_ it is not important then I would not be writing a comment
in the first place! Far too lazy for that.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, (continued)
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, David Kastrup, 2004/02/26
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/02/26
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Johan Bockgård, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, David Kastrup, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Johan Bockgård, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/02/29
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/02/29
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, David Kastrup, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/26
- Message not available
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, David Kastrup, 2004/02/26
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Kevin Rodgers, 2004/02/26
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/27
- Message not available
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/27
- Message not available
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Dan Katz, 2004/02/26