[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs becoming Word? |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:37:57 +0200 |
> From: Henrik Enberg <henrik.enberg@telia.com>
> Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:30:39 +0100
>
> It would probably be a bad idea to list every minor change. The file
> would get so large no one would have the patience to read it all.
No, it won't, since all user-visible changes are already listed there.
The single most important omission is that changes that fix bugs are
not listed.
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, (continued)
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/26
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, David Kastrup, 2005/03/25
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Joe Corneli, 2005/03/25
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Gian Uberto Lauri, 2005/03/26
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Joe Corneli, 2005/03/26
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, David Kastrup, 2005/03/26
- Message not available
- Bad iso-2022-jp encoding (was: Is Emacs becoming Word?), Reiner Steib, 2005/03/26
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, David Kastrup, 2005/03/25
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Henrik Enberg, 2005/03/25
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Joe Corneli, 2005/03/25
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/26
Message not available