[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice aga
From: |
Dave Pawson |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:35:05 +0100 |
On 23/09/2007, Bastien <bzg@altern.org> wrote:
> "Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > My offer is to convert the emacs documentation into docbook, version 5
> > and work with those interested to improve it/bring it up to scratch.
>
> It would be like trying to convert man pages into docbook. Why?
Because XML is more flexible and a more modern standard for documentation IMHO.
>
> I guess too many developpers actually use Texinfo to document their
> code, and both users and developpers seem to be happy with that.
You may be right. I think it is worth challenging though, otherwise
we'll never progress?
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
- Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again, Dave Pawson, 2007/09/23
- Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again, Bastien, 2007/09/23
- Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again,
Dave Pawson <=
- Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again, Bastien, 2007/09/23
- Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again, Tom Tromey, 2007/09/23
- Re: Emacs documentation., Alan Mackenzie, 2007/09/29
- Re: Emacs documentation., Dave Pawson, 2007/09/29
- Re: Emacs documentation., Peter Dyballa, 2007/09/29
- Re: Emacs documentation., Alan Mackenzie, 2007/09/29
- Re: Emacs documentation., Eli Zaretskii, 2007/09/29
- Message not available