[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs documentation.
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs documentation. |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Sep 2007 18:33:58 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:46:01 +0000
> From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
> Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
>
> I suspect most Docbook writers actually use special purpose editors
> to create their source code, rather than Emacs or vi.
I think the real reason is that, in professional book publishing
business, many editorial and other auxiliary tools speak Docbook. I'm
quite sure I've heard this in the past from someone who published
several books (and needed makeinfo's Docbook output feature for that
very reason).
- Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again, Dave Pawson, 2007/09/23
- Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again, Bastien, 2007/09/23
- Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again, Dave Pawson, 2007/09/23
- Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again, Bastien, 2007/09/23
- Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again, Tom Tromey, 2007/09/23
- Re: Emacs documentation., Alan Mackenzie, 2007/09/29
- Re: Emacs documentation., Dave Pawson, 2007/09/29
- Re: Emacs documentation., Peter Dyballa, 2007/09/29
- Re: Emacs documentation., Alan Mackenzie, 2007/09/29
- Re: Emacs documentation.,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Message not available